Thank you for bringing attention to humanity's most important topic going forward. We need to be asking all of the questions you bring up in this interview. I've been writing a lot on these topics and some of my viewpoints listed and referenced below in the event you interested further.
There are no laws that are going to prevent the inevitable evolution of AI. The issue is that the technology is just too cheap and ubiquitous. Also, as we would expect all laws will simply be written to protect the large institutions and lock everyone else out of the tech.
No IP laws are going to applicable to this technology as it is essentially a skill/technology replication machine. Plagiarism is not a true analogy for how the AIs construct a response. It is not merely a cut-n-paste from existing sources. Nonetheless, even if that were true, it won't remain that way. Training methods will evolve until this won't be remotely applicable. So we will have to deal with this scenario in the end anyway.
All of this is going to bring about an enormous challenge to purpose and meaning for everyone.
My much deeper breakdown of AI and implications for society can be found here.
The super intelligence is goals are greatly disturbing. They are building their entire premise on a logical fallacy. It is a paradox. Alignment simply is not possible the way they have described it.
Thank you for bringing attention to humanity's most important topic going forward. We need to be asking all of the questions you bring up in this interview. I've been writing a lot on these topics and some of my viewpoints listed and referenced below in the event you interested further.
There are no laws that are going to prevent the inevitable evolution of AI. The issue is that the technology is just too cheap and ubiquitous. Also, as we would expect all laws will simply be written to protect the large institutions and lock everyone else out of the tech.
No IP laws are going to applicable to this technology as it is essentially a skill/technology replication machine. Plagiarism is not a true analogy for how the AIs construct a response. It is not merely a cut-n-paste from existing sources. Nonetheless, even if that were true, it won't remain that way. Training methods will evolve until this won't be remotely applicable. So we will have to deal with this scenario in the end anyway.
All of this is going to bring about an enormous challenge to purpose and meaning for everyone.
My much deeper breakdown of AI and implications for society can be found here.
https://www.mindprison.cc/p/ai-and-the-end-to-all-things
The super intelligence is goals are greatly disturbing. They are building their entire premise on a logical fallacy. It is a paradox. Alignment simply is not possible the way they have described it.
I explain the logical fallacy here.
https://www.mindprison.cc/p/ai-singularity-the-hubris-trap
Yes, everything like neuralink is extremely disturbing as all of this tech is an invasion of privacy. With no privacy there is no liberty, no freedom.
Some of the privacy concerns developing.
https://www.mindprison.cc/p/ai-end-of-privacy-end-of-sanity